|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, November 06 2012 @ 05:09 PM EST |
Sorry, but your logical inference there is unsupportable.
You might find this article helpful in
understanding the error.
Pay close attention to this text in the final
paragraph:
But the inverse of a conditional is not inferable from
the conditional. For example, "If it's not raining, then Sam will not meet Jack
at the movies" cannot be inferred from "If it's raining, then Sam will meet Jack
at the movies." It could easily be the case that Sam and Jack are attending the
movies no matter the weather.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 08:42 AM EST |
Actually, the issue is:
If plaintiff A knew that juror J was biased against defendant
S, did plaintiff A have a duty to disclose such bias to the
court.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|