|
Authored by: kuroshima on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 02:12 PM EST |
For any mistake you find in the original post. Use a title
like tytle->title[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 02:12 PM EST |
Apple just looks like a Patent troll with all these lawsuits. Even with first
trial all apple did was fuel a massive buying spree by customers getting the
galaxy S3.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: kuroshima on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 02:16 PM EST |
Please include a (clickable) link for the newspick, so it can
be found after it scrolls off the main page[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Stylus. - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 03:16 PM EST
- Facetime Infringes - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 03:23 PM EST
- Virnetx - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 04:12 PM EST
- Microsoft patents spy-TV to check you've paid for content - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 06:46 PM EST
- Report: Samsung Delays New Fab Over Apple Uncertainty - Authored by: N_au on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 12:21 AM EST
- What is Apple spending to drop Samsung as a supplier? - Authored by: JimDiGriz on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 06:31 AM EST
- Microsoft: ‘We believe our patent laws have served the country very well' - Authored by: Gringo_ on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 08:13 AM EST
- Suggested translation? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 08:40 AM EST
- Def: Innovation - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 11:00 AM EST
- Def: Innovation - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 01:54 PM EST
- MS's chief patent counsel Eppenauer: ‘We believe our patent laws have served the country well - Authored by: squib on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 08:34 AM EST
- Did Apple get an earful (OTR) in the UK? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 10:32 AM EST
- Editorial: is Engadget really that stupid? Or just corrupt? Or trolling us all? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 02:34 PM EST
- Apple Copies Switch Watch Design - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 02:35 PM EST
|
Authored by: kuroshima on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 02:20 PM EST |
No mention of THIS Apple vs Samsung trial is allowed here.
mentions of the OTHER Apple vs Samsung trial are allowed
though. Just make it clear that you're referring to the OTHER
trial, you know, the one with the $1b judgement and that
Hogan juror.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Picking your brains (zombie subthread) - Authored by: hardmath on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 02:37 PM EST
- One Percent-ers and Citizens United - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 03:08 PM EST
- Gabon gets Leaned On - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 03:09 PM EST
- 20 Most Innovative People In Democracy 2012 - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 03:19 PM EST
- Apple's shares slide to five-month low - Authored by: Gringo_ on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 05:57 PM EST
- VirnetX patents VNS + DNS - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 10:00 PM EST
- ... because he was nailed there ... - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 10:57 PM EST
- The Register: Microsoft patents spy-TV to check you've paid for content - Authored by: macrorodent on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 11:52 PM EST
- FutureWeird: Windows 8 takes over Android in web traffic - Authored by: Winter on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 04:33 AM EST
- FutureWeird: Windows 8 takes over Android in web traffic - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 05:06 AM EST
- FutureWeird: Windows 8 takes over Android in web traffic - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 07:50 AM EST
- Usual MS pr (vapour?) spin? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 08:43 AM EST
- *IF* true, it means that Windows8 has a few big corporate customers, and they update hourly!! - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 10:54 AM EST
- Oh, they have that problem again. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 11:27 AM EST
- FutureWeird: Windows 8 takes over Android in web traffic - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 12:13 PM EST
- FutureWeird: possibly this - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 12:35 PM EST
- FutureWeird: Windows 8 takes over Android in web traffic - Authored by: PJ on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 01:09 PM EST
- Newspick? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 01:35 PM EST
- FutureWeird: Windows 8 takes over Android in web traffic - Authored by: AntiFUD on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 02:00 PM EST
- Steam on linux - external beta underway - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 06:39 AM EST
- Canada's Supreme Court Strips Patent From Pfizer - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 12:20 PM EST
- Pfizer loses Canadian [redacted] patent - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 12:20 PM EST
- Police Chief's Custom Spam Filter Blocks Occupy Protestors, Brutality Complaints And (Oops) tl - Authored by: artp on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 01:53 PM EST
- apple doubles down on hiding apology - Authored by: designerfx on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 02:25 PM EST
|
Authored by: kuroshima on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 02:22 PM EST |
Post here your transcriptions of the Comes vs Microsoft
documents. Use HTML markup, but post in plain text mode so
it's effortless for Mark and PJ to copy it and paste it on
the site.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: kuroshima on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 02:30 PM EST |
If it's going to be in the same judge's court, then it means
that we may see the same treatment that we saw in the
previous trial, were Apple was given plenty of slack, but
Samsung, not so much? Will the judge instead wise up to
Apple's litigation strategy? Who knows... I'll grab the
popcorn through.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Valerion on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 02:34 PM EST |
Ars Technica has the patent number incorrect in the article, but the link is
correct. The patent is D670,286 and here's the
link to the USPTO page for it. In order to view the images, you will need a
Quictime plugin. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 02:42 PM EST |
Doesn't Apple need to sue Google directly over Android?
---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.
"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 02:57 PM EST |
So this one, the "now with added Android" trial, could be called
"the '630 case", and the other one - the "Hogan's Heros"
trial - could be called "the '846 case"?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 03:30 PM EST |
The new one, D607,286 is not to be confused
with the old one, D504,889.
See arstechnica.
I would have put this under OT but I suspect
Apple will attempt to morph this case to use
this new bogus patent.
---
You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: DannyB on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 04:04 PM EST |
Hey Apple, while you are no doubt busy with your patent nuclear war, I just
wanted to take a moment to remind you about a saying about
those who live in glass houses.
--- The
price of freedom is eternal litigation. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 04:55 PM EST |
Now that Ars is reporting that they've gotten a new rounded rectangle design
patent, I thought I'd throw out this old bit of folklore:
http://www.folklore.org/StoryView.py?story=Round_Rects_Are_Everywhere.txt
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 05:11 PM EST |
Interesting that Samsung so strongly oppose adding android
to the suit. Whilst they are quite dependent on Google with
their successful products currently, I don't think they like
being beholden to a third party for one of their core
businesses and might be happy to throw android under a bus
if one of their in-house solutions were mature enough.
Given a few more years working on their in house stuff and
app platform, they might be happy to see android hit legal
trouble, as it would take their competitors out of the
market and lead them to clean up with total control over
their ecosystem.
I'd like to see Google go heavily on the offensive now, and
directly target Apple's patents and products.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 06:26 PM EST |
If you round the corners enough, you end up with a circle.
How much "rounding" does Apple "own"?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 08:16 PM EST |
Methinks this could be condensed, by taking each of the 37 claims,
showing what part of any one of the 19 devices accused is supposed to
infringe, then showing that the other 18 do exactly the same thing.
What ever happened to "Judicial Economy"? This looks more like
burying
in a blizzard of dead trees that noone except a computer can track
properly!
(Christenson)
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 08:58 PM EST |
but will they come with screens to display anything? :) [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 11:07 PM EST |
"The log in and password information for the FTP site was then emailed to
Samsung’s counsel"
FTP? I sure hope the counsel involved on both sides are all aware that FTP is
an entirely unsecured protocol.
Don't recall setting up a server with any FTP service for any purpose in well
over a decade. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 12:57 AM EST |
Wait, it what sense does Samsung make, use, offer for sale, or sell JB? Copy,
yes, build, yes.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: indyandy on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 01:08 AM EST |
From Apple's filing quoted above:
10. In the process of uploading
the Word files to the proper shared network folder, downloading the files in
Word, renaming and assigning exhibit numbers to the files, converting the files
to PDF and finally uploading them to the FTP site, miscommunication among the
team members lead to the omission and mislabeling of certain claim charts from
the FTP site. Additional details of these errors will are provided in the
paragraphs below.
(my emphasis)
By Apple's own logic they
"could have" and "should have" got the documents right first time. Surely they
waived their right to make changes now by getting it wrong in the first place
and then waiting an inordinate amount of time before trying to correct their
error?
Remember how Mr Quinn was reduced to asking "What's the point" of
holding the trial when faced by Judge Koh's ruling of July 29 2012 (Filing
1456)"
[Page 2]
11-19
Sustained. Pursuant to Judge Grewal’s
Order, theories of invalidity based on the
evidence and references in slides
11-19 were not timely disclosed in Samsung’s
invalidity/non-infringement
contentions and therefore are excluded.
21-22
Sustained. The images
of, and testimony regarding, the Sony style designs in the
slides are excluded
because of their untimely disclosure pursuant to Judge
Grewal’s
Order.
(my emphasis)
Sauce for the goose perhaps? [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|