|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 07 2012 @ 03:27 PM EST |
One of the news casts last night commented that all that money wasn't wasted, it
was spent on advertising, printing, TV, lawyers... which goes back into the
economy. How much was only on paper, with a company providing 'in kind'
services, which would normally have been spent on their own advertising is yet
to be seen (ie contributing to pro pipeline candidate vs running pro pipeline
ads). Many play both sides so they don't offend anyone.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Tyro on Thursday, November 08 2012 @ 08:01 PM EST |
It's probably working out fine. All the ads they paid for have the politicians
that got elected even more indebted to them than a more reasonably priced
election would have yielded.
After all, they bought BOTH sides, so whoever won would be indebted to them.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|