|
Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Friday, November 09 2012 @ 06:38 PM EST |
Then why the the English Judges say this?
"(c) There is a finding and injunction, limited to Germany alone, that the
10.1 and 8.9 infringe German unfair competition law."
It sounds to me by using "is" that part of the German decision
"is" still in force. The sentence immediately before uses the past
tense to refer to the part of the case about the community design.
"(b) As regards the Community Registered Design, the German Courts held
that neither the Galaxy 10.1 nor the 8.9 infringed it. As to the 7.7 there was
for a short while a German provisional order holding that it infringed. Whether
there was a jurisdiction to make that order is very doubtful for the reasons
given in my earlier judgment but in any event the order had been (or should have
been) discharged by the time the Contested Notice was published."
---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.
"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|