|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 07:35 AM EST |
Well I guess you all remember how it got started:
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/08/when-patents-attack-android.html
Google Senior VP & Chief Legal Officer mentions two patent pools there:
Novell/CPTN (DoJ forced them to license out their IP) and Nortel/Rockstar. The
latter got no repute from DoJ and no Apple seems to be silently misusing it:
http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-rockstar-bidco-nortel-patents-2012-
11?op=1
Any reason why DoJ cared only about one pool and not the other?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 07:44 AM EST |
Apple will be able to name several products it's been
anxious to
accuse — including the Galaxy Note 10.1,
all versions of Android 4.1
Jelly Bean that were
distributed on the Galaxy Nexus, and the Galaxy S
III.
Either that, or the Verge article was wrong. I read it
to
mean that the software itself was now accused - allbeit in
the forms used
on the Galaxy Nexus device alone. My
understanding was that this would then be
potentially
extendible to other Android 4.1 products by other
manufacturers as
the features are not "colorably different".
Seems like that was wrong.
Even so, I'm guessing a
hypothetical injunction against the Galaxy Nexus on the
basis of Android 4.1 features would set some precedent for
future cases
against other devices / manufacturers - though
each case would have to be tried
separately. It would also
have massive FUD value.
Google still need to
defend this vigorously.
(not a lawyer)
Stevos.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Kilz on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 07:50 AM EST |
Please list the mistake in the title of your post. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Corrections - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 09:01 AM EST
- opposing -> proposing - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 02:08 PM EST
|
Authored by: Kilz on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 07:51 AM EST |
For all posts that are not on topic. Please make all links
clickable.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Puzzled by English - the "prejudice" word - Authored by: kuroshima on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 08:21 AM EST
- Feel like swimming - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 11:21 AM EST
- Scalia on politicization of the courts - Authored by: YurtGuppy on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 11:47 AM EST
- AAPL value - Authored by: UncleVom on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 11:47 AM EST
- Germany - Federal Court: Parents Not Responsible For Their Teenager’s Music Piracy - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 12:04 PM EST
- Visualizing Prime Numbers - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 12:16 PM EST
- winsupersite.com: The numbers don't lie: There is Android and then there is everything else - Authored by: SilverWave on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 12:38 PM EST
- BC - Police use of licence plate scans breaks privacy law: information and privacy commissioner - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 12:58 PM EST
- Will Your Paycheck Fall Off The Fiscal Cliff? Link to paycheck calculator. - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 01:29 PM EST
- eBay sued over will-not-recruit agreement with Intuit - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 08:02 PM EST
|
Authored by: Kilz on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 07:53 AM EST |
Please mention the news stories name in the title of the top
post. A link to the story is helpful for when it falls off
the Home page.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Is this why Romney ran for the Presidency? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 10:27 AM EST
- Ohio Bar Association Pressured Judge To Keep Quiet About Justice For Sale - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 11:02 AM EST
- Voters rejected the crusade to politicize the courts - Authored by: deck2 on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 11:44 AM EST
- Google Books team open sources their book scanner - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 02:19 PM EST
- Apple patents page turn animations - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 06:27 PM EST
- Apple, Google Consider Arbitration Over Standard Patents - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 06:43 PM EST
- Found it - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, November 17 2012 @ 01:13 AM EST
- Samsung goes after HTC deal to undercut Apple-filing - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 07:41 PM EST
- EFF's Defend Innovation - Authored by: Gringo_ on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 11:29 PM EST
- Patent Office, Perhaps Forgetting What Year It Is, Locks Down Mobile App Development Platforms - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 11:41 PM EST
- Windows 8 Sales "Modest" - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, November 17 2012 @ 12:12 AM EST
- Windows 8 Sales Well Below Projections, Plenty of Blame to Go Around - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, November 17 2012 @ 02:00 AM EST
|
Authored by: Kilz on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 07:55 AM EST |
Please leave all transcriptions of Comes exhibits here for
PJ. Please post them as html in Plain Old Text mode for easy
copying.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Kilz on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 07:57 AM EST |
Its been out for awhile. Perhaps it will be added soon. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 16 2012 @ 11:03 AM EST |
BusinessWeek often has problems in covering Legal and Technical news.
Their reporting ranges from good to terrible, with most of it being at the
terrible end of the spectrum.
I always check their reporting now. It's the only way to be safe.
Wayne
http://madhatter.ca
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: vadim on Sunday, November 18 2012 @ 04:22 AM EST |
PJ It seems that you're mistaken here.
Apple CAN add Jelly Bean to the
lawsuit.
"Apple’s similarly-situated motion to amend to add the Samsung
Galaxy
Note 10.1, the U.S.
version of the Samsung Galaxy S III, the Jelly
Bean operating
system in connection with the
Galaxy Nexus, the
nonsubstantive clarifying changes,
51
the claims charts previously listed in the
Claim Summary Table, and the pen stylus claims against additional
products is
GRANTED"
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|