Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, November 25 2012 @ 05:22 PM EST |
> Chinese batteries don't seem of high quality.
As with most things of Chinese origin, there is very good stuff to be had, and
very bad stuff as well. Most stuff falls somewhere in-between.
The difficult bit, IME, is telling the good from the bad before you get hold of
it...
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: AlexWright on Sunday, November 25 2012 @ 07:12 PM EST |
And of course that is quite a problem when you manufacture a
product without a removable battery...[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, November 25 2012 @ 10:20 PM EST |
No.It will be caused by the silly users holding it wrong [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, November 25 2012 @ 11:30 PM EST |
LithiumPolymer batteries have a number of safety/failure factors during
manufacture, storage, transport, and abuse by the operator. I read detailed
analyses of a Toshiba and an Apple problem, but didn't keep copies, now there's
too
much noise in the
channel... ISTR Toshiba's problem came from internal
thermal cycling causing physical damage to the electrode separator material; and
Apple's from unauthorised substitution of a lower priced, lower purity chemical
component.
There's a rather dry description of what to do after they
catch fire
Fire
Protection Engineering , a slightly more exciting ppt/pdf of how they blow
stuff up from
faa.gov , and adding fuel to the unfortunate flames at least one of the
devices on the manifest was identified as "Android" in this interim report(PDF)
on the loss of a plane full of batteries
at Dubai, September 2010.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: albert on Monday, November 26 2012 @ 11:51 AM EST |
{:-)> [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- OK, whose shorts? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, November 26 2012 @ 01:15 PM EST
|