|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 28 2012 @ 03:57 PM EST |
http://samuelhorti.wordpress.com/2012/11/22/milorad-trkulja-the-aussie-that-sued
-google/
Google goofed big time. Remember the next time something like this happens it
could be one of us or if you like one of you.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, November 28 2012 @ 05:10 PM EST |
They seem to have acted, as judge, jury and executioner despite knowing they
were wrong. That is unacceptable and no amount of 'spinning' will hide that
fact. We can do without developing a cult of Google in addition to the alleged
cult of Apple. They did wrong and got slapped end of story.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: albert on Wednesday, November 28 2012 @ 06:10 PM EST |
The only 'fact' I found was: "...the police report explicitly rejected the
possibility that it was claiming as truth...".
The police are not a position to rule on this matter. The only thing they can
legally say is that the plaintiff has no police record, and is not under
investigation, neither of which has been mentioned. No quotes (other than the
plaintiff) are included. No sources are cited. It's an opinion piece
masquerading as journalism. As far as we know, there was no proof provided to
Google. The proper procedure would have been to file charges against the
perpetrators. Clearly, the court has no understanding of how the internet
works, or how stupid its users can be. The plaintiff went after the deep
pockets, and won.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Other way around - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 29 2012 @ 06:33 AM EST
|
|
|
|