|
Authored by: charlie Turner on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 06:43 PM EST |
OT [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: charlie Turner on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 06:44 PM EST |
Please don't ask me to parse that! [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: charlie Turner on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 06:46 PM EST |
Keep things to gnus picks, please! [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: charlie Turner on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 06:49 PM EST |
Keep it correct. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: charlie Turner on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 06:51 PM EST |
n/t [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- So basically this is like a twitter conversation? N/T - Authored by: OpenSourceFTW on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 08:21 PM EST
- Yes, but limited to 3 characters. - Authored by: charlie Turner on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 08:30 PM EST
- #no - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 09:00 PM EST
- Yes - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 10:21 PM EST
- you - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 10:22 PM EST
- are - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 10:24 PM EST
- all - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 10:25 PM EST
- mad - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 10:27 PM EST
- cap - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 10:28 PM EST
- !Me - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 10:30 PM EST
- too - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 10:31 PM EST
- ~:) - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 10:35 PM EST
- Oy! - Authored by: red floyd on Thursday, December 06 2012 @ 02:01 AM EST
- OK - Authored by: albert on Friday, December 07 2012 @ 12:56 PM EST
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 06:53 PM EST |
If they did their planning, they should be able to file a cross reference the
next day. Of course they'll wait till the last minute to give the opposition as
little time as they can to study it.
Wayne
http://madhatter.ca
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 06:56 PM EST |
The more a given party attempts to play loose with her order, the more
methinks said party isn't going to be too happy with the end result.
If
party Y claims party Z argued something Z didn't and Z easily shows that via the
docs filed.... methinks party Y is not going to be too happy.
I don't
think they'll be particular punished for such behavior. I think the extent of
their punishment will be their extra filings are ignored - as the Court said it
would be while the other party's filings are not trimmed down.
So they
won't be too unhappy. The cheater never feels too bad when the only punishment
is that the cheat didn't work.
RAS[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 07:07 PM EST |
>> Both parties have accused the other of violating her order.
Lewis Carrol mocked this childish rubbish a hundred and fifty years ago.
Of course lawyers wouldn't read it, he was a mathematician.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: celtic_hackr on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 07:22 PM EST |
Filed by December 7th!
Love it!
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: webster on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 07:51 PM EST |
.
Each side will do their own and their opponents just to check. If one started
to do it, the other matched it. A billion dollar verdict and they are counting
pages!
This pruning is a little late. It shows the brilliance of Judge Alsup's
preliminary pruning --make the plaintiff proceed on their four best claims so as
not to confuse the jury. They can try the rest in future years!
Imagine jamming this issue along with a hundred others into an appeal brief.
.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: OpenSourceFTW on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 08:16 PM EST |
Up to 264, that's *pulls out calculator* 100001000 in binary.
Sustained
enthusiasm is a good thing. This is great for getting the word out about
Groklaw.
http://www.abajournal.com/blawg100
(Legal Technology)
And all this formatted posting is great for
keeping my HTML from getting rusty :P.--- I voted for Groklaw (Legal
Technology Category) in the 2012 ABA Journal Blawg 100. Did you?
http://www.abajournal.com/blawg100. Voting ends Dec 21. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 08:48 PM EST |
It seems to me that the time limits and page limits imposed
on the parties during the trial favour Apple, considering
that their arguments are only to allege infringement whereas
for all 11(?) patents, Samsung has to deny infringement AND
prove the patents invalid, which I would consider to be a
much more difficult and time consuming task.
Meaning that in the end, Samsung has to go over their
arguments briefly and perhaps unconvincingly, whereas Apple
could go over them in detail.
I understand that without such limits we could possibly
still be in trial right now, but it would seem more fair if
each party had a certain page limit per claim brought by
/brought against them.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 09:48 PM EST |
Not in itself, it seems like a perfectly reasonable order --two weeks from the
hearing.
This is more the way a nasty lawyer would work then a judge, providing a last
minute surprise that takes up the resources of the lawyers the day before a
hearing. It also makes it harder for lawyers to react should she bring up a
surprise tomorrow. Of course, if a judge were biased such a surprise would be a
perfect way of undermining one of the parties.<sarcasm> Good thing we know
this judge is not biased. </sarcasm> [1]
I also do not think it is proper for a judge to try and be tricking attorneys,
which this sort smells like.
Mouse The Lucky Dog
[1] ATM I do not think the judge is outright biased, however when she has let
her biases show they have tended to indicate a bias towards Apple.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 06 2012 @ 11:48 AM EST |
LAWYERS don't hunt elephants, but they do follow the herds
around arguing about who owns the droppings.
SOFTWARE LAWYERS will claim that they own an entire herd based
on the look and feel of one dropping.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|