|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 20 2012 @ 08:16 AM EST |
I do not understand that if Kodak was not pursuing legal
enforcement of their patents how can IV$ pursue any form
of legal enforcement? I can see that they could offer new
licenses for new uses, but going after previously not-sued
infringers makes no sense.
However, knowing who IV$ really is, I'm sure they will find
a way to sue anybody who has taken, is taking, or will take
a picture with any kind of camera.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 20 2012 @ 10:36 AM EST |
It will really need to start hurting the politicos before they take belated
action. The place could become a wasteland buried under heaps of patent writs
and skeletons (of lawyers?).[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 31 2012 @ 06:52 PM EST |
offers an informative opniion on the injunction. Ignoring appeals and assuming
this injunction is the end of the argument, Microsoft could still sell Word with
the infringing functions removed. Furthermore, the injunction does not mention
the several other applications that comprise the Office suite. A bit too soon to
suggest it may cause the demise of Microsoft Office.In regards to Word's death
by technical irrelevance, perhaps one day in a post-print future. Hopefully by
then, we've slaked the world's unquenchable thirst for .doc and ODF is as well
supported as you described. Before that day, Wiki software would have to become
as usable and functional as Word. Is anyone making something like this?PS: I
like the new site layout.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|