Authored by: artp on Friday, December 21 2012 @ 07:10 PM EST |
I noticed that line, too.
I can hardly wait to see how Apple 'splains this one away.
Personally, I think that Samsung should be just fine if the
EU sees the same things that I see. Perhaps the EU is just
dotting the i's and crossing the t's before going after the
real target - Apple. Didn't they start this patent circus in
the first place? Abusing SEPs can swing both ways, you know.
---
Userfriendly on WGA server outage:
When you're chained to an oar you don't think you should go down when the galley
sinks ?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 21 2012 @ 07:47 PM EST |
Willing as long as its what Apple wants. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 21 2012 @ 08:20 PM EST |
Let me highlight the keyword again:
such conduct may be
abusive
As a result any cheering by fans that FRAND patents can't be used
defensively against a patent attack may be premature to the actual end
result.
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 22 2012 @ 06:58 PM EST |
- The investigations have thus far been internal, and this Statement of
Objections is formal notice to Samsung that the EC has
found something they
don't like, would Samsung Please Explain
- There has been
expansion of this invitation to file a brief, into formal charges by many
of the press.
- Even though Samsung has withdrawn its (applications
for?) injunctions, this is not like a US case where the attorneys shake hands
and go out for a drink together and the whole case is dropped. Once it gets on
the books in Europe it stays on the books. Samsung could be
punished, present
or future good behaviour may not absolve past sins.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|