Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 04:24 AM EST |
'nuff said :( [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 09:28 AM EST |
Shouldn't the judge be on the "justice" side even if he finds the
lawyer annoying? There should be punishment for justice misconduct of course,
but it should be for that misconduct not for something else.
The defendant having to pay royalties for invalid patent to another party (e.g.
not fine) for lawyers misconduct does not sounds like it.
The results is still unfair.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 29 2012 @ 02:20 AM EST |
The judge in that case was enraged because RIM tried to argue that as a Canadian
company they were subject to Canadian patent law over which US courts don't have
jurisdiction. That caused the judge to blow his stack.
Nothing seems to infuriate US judges more than a foreign company having the
temerity to suggest that US courts might not have jurisdiction over the entire
world.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|