|
Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 05:56 AM EST |
:-)
---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 05:57 AM EST |
:D
---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Post-Industrial Journalism: Adapting to the Present - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 07:20 AM EST
- More fallout from Jimmie Saville - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 02:34 PM EST
- Tablets rule! - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 04:17 PM EST
- Tablets rule! - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 05:27 PM EST
- The Guardian 'smears' PJ for her awareness of a "smear campaign"? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 04:21 PM EST
- When is a Paywall Not a Paywall? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 05:56 PM EST
- Ohio anonymous bloggers case - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 06:55 PM EST
- CPU Architect and Designer at Intel does Reddit AMA. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 11:35 PM EST
- HP Autonomy deal under investigation - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 01:15 AM EST
- Marvel to fight "Theoretical Methods" - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 01:42 AM EST
- Dotcom Civil Plaintiff Wants Action - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 02:53 PM EST
- Murdoch's Pirates .. - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 05:41 PM EST
- squarcles - now with patents - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 06:20 PM EST
- [Moxley Confidential] CSI Games: If DNA Evidence Doesn't Fit in Orange County, Alter It? - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 29 2012 @ 10:47 AM EST
- One Tesla: A DIY Singing Tesla Coil (GPL/DPL) - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 29 2012 @ 12:27 PM EST
- Prenda Law and his caretaker at Law .. - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 29 2012 @ 04:39 PM EST
- Did the ABA Journal only want Lawyers to VOTE! - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 29 2012 @ 08:21 PM EST
- lol. 13 ugliest cell phones.. - Authored by: myNym on Saturday, December 29 2012 @ 08:24 PM EST
- Dotcom Good for New Zealand - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, December 30 2012 @ 12:21 AM EST
|
Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 05:58 AM EST |
;-)
---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Who Is Too Unbalanced to Be Armed? - Authored by: cricketjeff on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 06:11 AM EST
- Who Is Too Unbalanced to Be Armed? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 07:12 AM EST
- Who Is Too Unbalanced to Be Armed? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 07:30 AM EST
- for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man - Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 08:09 AM EST
- that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed - Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 08:12 AM EST
- Wherever standing armies are kept up, - Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 08:14 AM EST
- have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might - Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 08:28 AM EST
- Exactly - Remember when Al Haig said that he was "in charge" (he meant/might have dreamed of it) - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 08:45 AM EST
- Armed 1776 vs 2012 - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 10:54 AM EST
- The Founding Fathers and their Single Shot Weapons - Authored by: hardmath on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 11:44 AM EST
- Unless they actually try to use it that way...? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 04:49 PM EST
- Who Is Too Unbalanced to Be Armed? - Authored by: PJ on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 05:54 PM EST
- Who Is Too Unbalanced to Be Armed? - Authored by: cricketjeff on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 05:12 AM EST
- Who Is Too Unbalanced to Be Armed? - Authored by: odysseus on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 06:00 AM EST
- Here is a list (or the start of one)... in these links might be more to the story? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 09:06 AM EST
- By the same token.. - Authored by: myNym on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 01:48 PM EST
- Who Is Too Unbalanced to Be Armed? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 03:38 PM EST
- Logic Error! - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 03:45 PM EST
- Defense Against Oppressive Government - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 10:30 PM EST
- Thanks for the LOL PJ - Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 06:52 AM EST
- ReadWriteWeb: Sarcasm Overload - "Yes, Randi Zuckerberg, speak to us about human decency." - Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 07:54 AM EST
- Health Care Sector Vulnerable to Hackers - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 02:06 PM EST
- Congress Defeats E-Mail Privacy Legislation — Again - Authored by: Gringo_ on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 12:41 AM EST
- Freedom of Speech - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 05:30 AM EST
- Trulia takes aim at Zillow patent suit: ‘Abstract ideas and principles are not patentable’ - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 06:18 PM EST
- Global Patent Chaos Creates Unwinnable Game for Mobile Tech Giants - Authored by: kg on Saturday, December 29 2012 @ 10:02 PM EST
- Microsoft Has Been Watching - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, December 30 2012 @ 12:16 AM EST
|
Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 06:00 AM EST |
:-|
---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 06:24 AM EST |
We have here a multi-billion dollar case, and the attorney is told on a whim
that he may not provide written briefs of his arguments. Then Zeller puts out a
comprehensive list of arguments, without dwelling on single points to the
detriments of others demanding equal attention, and basically wraps a very
complete package of relevant objections and supporting precedents, properly
apportioned and prioritized and cross-referenced, into a short time slot.
All of that is quite necessary and relevant to making an informed judgment.
How can anybody in a lower-profile case be expected to even deliver the
information necessary for finding justice? How is this kind of time allotment
which basically means a battle of efficiency and wits of lawyers (rather than of
merit) not leading to justice being bought with money? Your legal points carry
five times the weight if they are organized, prioritized and brought forward by
a well-versed lawyer.
I find that very disturbing.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 06:27 AM EST |
More haste, less speed.
Judge William Alsup set the Oracle Google trial in such away
that it was pared down to issues that were sufficiently
narrow as to be try-able and limited the number of questions
so that the Jury had a chance of understanding them.
Judge Lucy Koh in the present Apple V Samsung trial... didn't.
I think that once the appeals are though this case will be
very valuable for teaching future Judges how NOT to do
things.
What a train wreck :-(
"Your Honor, with all respect, five minutes is not enough
where someone is asking for two and a half billion dollars
on a whole host of claims."
---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 01:57 PM EST |
I was able to help out a little bit with the text. There's a word document
waiting in your inbox.
Josh[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 02:11 PM EST |
> I don't agree with you that the Gorham test requires deception
> at the time of purchasing. I don't think that's what the law is.
Several times during hearing the Rule 50 motion she tells Mr Zeller
not what the law is, but what she thinks it is, setting up the appeal.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: mossc on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 02:53 PM EST |
As far as the industry goes I don't think the term "global phone"
implies distribution worldwide. It is a term used to define compatibility with
the different worldwide cellular standards and frequencies.
If Verizon was selling a "global" or "world" phone I would
expect it to work with GSM networks overseas once enabled but would not expect
it to be sold in Europe/Asia/Africa etc. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Kevin on Thursday, December 27 2012 @ 03:11 PM EST |
Here's another what if: if any of the three patents the USPTO has --
after the trial -- preliminarily found invalid, contradicting the jury's view
that there is no prior art, are ruled invalid with finality before the end of
this trial and post-trial time period, then what? The jury allocated damages for
all three of those then-invalid patents, and so then what happens, without the
math to use to recalculate the damages? It's clearly not fair to have Samsung
pay the full amount if three of the utility patents are tossed
overboard.
I thought, as a matter of public policy, that a
jury's decision was final. If the patents are subsequently found invalid at the
USPTO, they remain valid against the particular defendant, in the interest of
having a final resolution of the issue at trial. Didn't that happen to Research
in Motion, convicted of infringing an invalid patent, and the conviction allowed
to stand? (Moreover, if I recall correctly, even the wilfulness part of the
conviction was allowed to stand; the fact that the USPTO agreed with RIM's legal
advisors did not keep the infringement from being adjudged wilful.
Am I
misremembering? --- 73 de ke9tv/2, Kevin (P.S. My surname is not
McBride!) [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, December 28 2012 @ 12:57 AM EST |
Apple cited a case where one criterian that could be used to set aside a damages
award is "speculation or guesswork". Couldn't a good lawyer argue
that is exactly what the jury in this case did?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, December 29 2012 @ 01:45 AM EST |
PJ likes to poke holes thru every Apple arguement but doesn't apply the
same effort to tear down Samsung?
BIAS
Never
Fandroids rage on, while rational people think. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|