|
Authored by: Ian Al on Thursday, January 03 2013 @ 05:07 AM EST |
"...we explore convergences drawn from research in neuroscience, semiotics,
and intellectual property management."
At least I can pick holes in your comment. The semiotic analysis of pragmatic (I
looked it up in a dictionary) gives,
adj 1: concerned with practical matters; "a matter-of-fact (or pragmatic)
approach to the problem".
And, before PJ beats me to it, there is no such thing as intellectual property
or the management of it, so the study is not related to legal pragmatics.
Unless, of course, the legal pragmatic is that the exercise of the law of
patents is not based on fact. I'd find it hard to argue that one.
I must go and spit on the carpet, now.
---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|