I run Linux at home. I have since 1998. I stopped using Microsoft primarily
because I was unhappy with the click-through EULA.
As a result,
Microsoft's version of anything is meaningless to me:
Microsoft code does
not touch my current pc (10 years old), never has, and never will!
For
example: because of the path Novell took with SUSE and the path Ubuntu decided
to go down: neither of those will ever be on my PC because I can't trust they do
not contain Microsoft code.
So I'm not in the least bit concerned with
what Microsoft thinks.
As I said: it has to be under the Owner's (not
user's) control! As you can see:
I heavily disagree with Microsoft and only
slightly disagree with the FSF.
So how do you figure I'm happy with the
click-through EULA based on what I authored previously? I really am curious how
you drew that conclusion.
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|