|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 31 2012 @ 04:39 PM EST |
"If I carry out the Bilski invention in my head (and I can) I will come up
with the EXACT SAME match of sellers and buyers. The fact that I've taken so
long to do the maths that both seller and buyer are six foot under is
irrelevant."
No. It's not. A patent is supposed to promote the useful arts. Answers that
are too late are simply not useful.
"As has been pointed out many times before, your argument boils down to
patenting "doing it faster", and that should be unpatentable as being
downright obvious."
If you read everything I wrote, I never suggested it should, merely that
sometimes speed is a necessary component, and sometimes a computer is necessary
to get the speed, therefore the argument that the computer is not really
necessary is often a bogus argument. Do with that what you will, except for
claiming that I have claimed that which I haven't.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|