|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, December 31 2012 @ 06:54 PM EST |
I can do the Bilski computation with an abacus.
The result might not always be available in time to maximize my profit, but i
will be able to do so on 'n' occasions, where 'n' is greater than zero.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Right. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, January 01 2013 @ 12:50 AM EST
|
Authored by: Wol on Tuesday, January 01 2013 @ 03:31 PM EST |
then the computer is a *minor* *part* of the invention. As per Diehr, what gets
patented is the whole, which (for the most part) has *nothing* to do with the
maths and lots to do with other stuff. In Diehr, it's rubber, an example was
given of the space shuttle.
The trouble with Bilski is - as the Supreme Court put it with Diehr - is that
there is minimal post-algorithm activity, and what there is is basic commerce.
Cheers,
Wol[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|