|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, January 05 2013 @ 12:48 AM EST |
My apologies for doing a reply on my own post. Bad style, i
know :-/
After some reflection, i think the 'parent' comes down to the
re-institution of the rule that a working prototype must be
supplied with the patent application.
I can well imagine the USPTO would not be overly happy to
have a working prototype of the Q-bomb in their basement, but
for software inventions i fail to see what objections to
storing and publishing working prototypes could be.
The software geeks might however come to regret they ever
invented Intercal.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- addendum... - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, January 06 2013 @ 09:58 AM EST
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, January 06 2013 @ 06:13 AM EST |
"INTERCAL"
(Wikipedia article)
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|