|
Authored by: jbb on Friday, January 04 2013 @ 07:21 PM EST |
IMO people here have said worse things about the Apple v. Samsung case he
is referring to. Let's look at the full paragraph:
This time it's
the so-called "pinch and zoom" patent
getting rejected by the US Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), and this is a big deal since that patent was one that
Apple used to achieve that huge $1 billion verdict against Samsung in a
California kangaroo court last
summer.
Let's look at the
definition
of Kangaroo
Court:
An unfair, biased, or hasty judicial proceeding that
ends in a harsh punishment
I really don't think it is an
unreasonable description of
what happened. It is certainly not a personal
attack (as the term ad hominem implies).
The key thing that you seem to be
overlooking is that Dan Lyons has switched sides. Holding a grudge against
someone and finding fault where this is none is
counter-productive.
--- Our job is to remind ourselves that there
are more contexts
than the one we’re in now — the one that we think is reality.
-- Alan Kay [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- I'm not others - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, January 04 2013 @ 08:43 PM EST
- Huh? - Authored by: PJ on Friday, January 04 2013 @ 10:23 PM EST
|
Authored by: PJ on Friday, January 04 2013 @ 10:51 PM EST |
He's disrespectful, something I think is
never appropriate to a court.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|