|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, January 07 2013 @ 11:00 AM EST |
Since the law enforcement official missed the second occupant, how could he/she
remember whether or not the corporation was properly restrained. Most likely,
the seat belt issue will not be pursued.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, January 07 2013 @ 06:11 PM EST |
No, this will not come out as a test of corporate personhood. A traffic court
judge doesn't have the authority to rule on 125 years SCOTUS precedent, rather
he is bound by it.
If the gentleman in questions thinks that the judges only options are to
overturn 125 years of precedent on corporate personhood or void his ticket, he
will discover soon enough that he is badly mistaken.
Assuming the judge allows him to even make the argument, the likely outcome is
that the traffic court judge will likely rule that the incorporation documents
being in the vehicle are not enough to make the corporation a passenger.
The ticket will stand and the gentleman will learn an expensive lesson.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|