Authored by: JamesK on Monday, January 07 2013 @ 05:03 PM EST |
I have one of those here, but I stopped using it a while ago, because it was
unreliable. It also only does 802.11g and my notebook & tablet can do
802.11n.
Anyone need a paper weight? ;-)
---
The following program contains immature subject matter.
Viewer discretion is advised.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Monday, January 07 2013 @ 06:09 PM EST |
It may still be a functional router, if you use
static ip addresses behind it.
---
You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, January 07 2013 @ 06:18 PM EST |
The issue with this router has nothing to do with the Y2K issue. There is no
way this is a 2 vs 4 digit year issue. The article you linked to notes that the
valid years in the router are 2002 - 2012. A ten year range that could be done
with only one stored digit.
This has nothing to do with Y2K and everything to do with planned obsolescence.
The product has a very likely deliberately built in time of failure.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Y2K+13 - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, January 08 2013 @ 05:55 AM EST
- Y2K+13 - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, January 08 2013 @ 09:27 AM EST
- Y2K+13 - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, January 09 2013 @ 06:21 AM EST
|