|
Authored by: webster on Friday, January 25 2013 @ 02:42 PM EST |
.
Maybe so, but parties file things all the time that they expect to be denied.
Arguments made in one motion may be a way of educating and arguing for another
motion or goal.
E.G. the instant motion for discovery encompassed arguments by Samsung as to how
the patents in question were not only invalid, obvious, but they were
technically improper having been published prior to the application. This will
float in one of the judge's cranial vacuums only to be wafted over by other
Samsung motions and arguments on another day invoking its righteousness and
sympathy. After all, the judge can't deny everything; he has to be fair; and
they are counting.
.
.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, January 26 2013 @ 11:33 AM EST |
Filing done, and it's a paint by numbers game.
Legal field numbers are what they are.
Maybe, to make sure it's all there for an appeal?
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|