|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, January 29 2013 @ 05:03 PM EST |
You say:
So you cannot bring in ease of cracking it compared to
10 years ago as one of your arguments whatever side you are arguing
for.
And I said:
Even assuming the worst case scenario
- a brute force usage as you describe - can't be relied on to be limitations for
too long.
Combined with:
I think we're doing both
Society and ourselves a great disservice if we focus on the technological
limitations instead of speaking to the heart of the situation. We're not helping
find a better resolution quicker. We're bogging it down with technical details
which - in my humble opinion - don't affect the fact that a privacy breach has
been comitted. Whether that privacy breach was done via a computer or walking
through an unlocked door and accessing an unlocked filing cabinet doesn't alter
the fact the it was still a breach of privacy.
So yup: I full agree
with what you've presented! It's what I said too :)
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|