.... probably the lifetimes of several universes.... if it finished that
early.
The most basic solution is the proverbial "brute force"
method.
However, when people read the subject, they're thinking someone
may have stumbled upon a better algorithm instead. After all - why would one
"yell from the rooftops" a solution that everyone already knows and was taught
in school.
So if one claims a patent, others expect an updated or new
invention... if an updated process isn't outlined, then the logical conclusion
is that it wasn't defined in sufficient detail. Ergo:
There are
functions that are easily specified, but not easily
computed.
logically equals:
It was not specified in sufficient
detail!
And if it is argued that it was defined in sufficient detail: then
the patent is laying claim to public knowledge! A clear breach of the
underlying patent exchange which is supposed to be knowledge disseminated
to the public in exchange for the limited monopoly. Instead - it
attempts to take from the public under the pretense of somehow giving
to.
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|