|
Authored by: servies on Wednesday, February 06 2013 @ 02:24 AM EST |
But the judge had refused to let the jury decide whether the
patents were valid, and he decided they were and awarded Soverain an ongoing
royalty as well as a damages-only trial on a 3rd patent. Newegg appealed, of
course, and -- finally able to present prior art -- Soverain's patents were
ruled [PDF] invalid.
This sounds to me as if this judge is
extremely biased in favor of patent owners... (I would almost say that he's
corrupt)
As a foreigner I do then wonder: does the result of such an appeal lead
to any consequenses for this judge...
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 06 2013 @ 09:43 AM EST |
FYI: The Soverain site still lists the original judgement
under Intellectual Property/Patents Valid & Infringed.
Should they not be compelled to remove that content or publish
a correction?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- It's still true - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 06 2013 @ 01:05 PM EST
- It's still true - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 07 2013 @ 11:29 AM EST
|
|
|
|