decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
The Newegg Victory over Soverain; and Newegg et al's Amicus Brief in Apple v. Motorola Appeal ~pj | 197 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The Newegg Victory over Soverain; and Newegg et al's Amicus Brief in Apple v. Motorola Appeal ~pj
Authored by: servies on Wednesday, February 06 2013 @ 02:24 AM EST
But the judge had refused to let the jury decide whether the patents were valid, and he decided they were and awarded Soverain an ongoing royalty as well as a damages-only trial on a 3rd patent. Newegg appealed, of course, and -- finally able to present prior art -- Soverain's patents were ruled [PDF] invalid.
This sounds to me as if this judge is extremely biased in favor of patent owners... (I would almost say that he's corrupt) As a foreigner I do then wonder: does the result of such an appeal lead to any consequenses for this judge...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The Newegg Victory over Soverain; and Newegg et al's Amicus Brief in Apple v. Motorola Appeal ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 06 2013 @ 09:43 AM EST
FYI: The Soverain site still lists the original judgement
under Intellectual Property/Patents Valid & Infringed.

Should they not be compelled to remove that content or publish
a correction?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • It's still true - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, February 06 2013 @ 01:05 PM EST
    • It's still true - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 07 2013 @ 11:29 AM EST
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )