Hard to tell which of the groups this one fits into:
Straight out troll -
raise a conflict where none exists for no other purpose then to raise a
conflict
Subversion - Corporations attempting to convince those of us
who rely on the GPL that it's really in our best interest to give the
Corporations the license terms they want and receive a little money in
exchange
Stupidity - like the Corporation who believed in the "GPL is
invalid" to the point it took a Judge to tell them "if I accept your theory, I
sure hope you have another license or you have admitted to a clear breach of
Copyright Law"
Meh!
At this point it doesn't matter. Enough has
been said that the individual can be entirely ignored with absolutely no ill
effects to oneself :)
Caveat: there's no rule that says the individual
can't fit into all three, it's not an either-or scenario like the imaginary
contract-or-copyright situation described ;)
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|