|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 11:14 PM EDT |
I believe in the individual right to exercise free will. If I want to
give/help, I give/help (and I often do, to those of my choosing). If I don't
want to give/help, I won't (as is my right to choose as well).
Without free will, such a "euphoria" is empty in meaning. So there is
a struggle between something that is meaningless (without free will and without
the individual right to exercise that free will) and something that has the
potential of being great (because it based on free will). The first is DOA,
because it requires extreme measures of manipulation to enforce. The other, a
great potential that free will advocates wish for.
But this has already gone beyond anything "tech" and well into the
ideals of political madness. The point is that GPLd code is no more communist
than proprietary code. Both are an exercise of free will.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|