decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
They do have a point...Or Not | 244 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
They do have a point...Or Not
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 10:38 AM EDT
I think you're right. The judges involved here are all well aware that SCO is
a sheer pointless waste of time. There are only a couple of people on one side
of this suit that don't want it to die immediately. The judges know this is
pointless. I could be wrong, but I don't think they're REQUIRED to rule at all.
If they have anything more important to do, like pluck their eyebrows, I say
more power to them: let them sit on it forever.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

They do have a point...Or Not
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, March 28 2013 @ 01:13 PM EDT
SCO could get case reopened fairly easily, but what the Utah court is baulking
is the partial reopening of the case. If SCO came back with permission from the
Delaware Judge to reopen the case fully they'd be in court in a few months.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )