|
Authored by: The_Pirate on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 11:02 AM EDT |
...Here, please. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: The_Pirate on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 11:03 AM EDT |
......! [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: The_Pirate on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 11:05 AM EDT |
How much wood could a Woodchuck chuck, if a Woodchuck could chuck wood?
1) 0.8 cu. meters
2) 1.2 cu. meters
3) 1.5 cu. meters[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- 3.62 cubic meters - Authored by: Gringo_ on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 11:14 AM EDT
- CISPA - Privacy protections booted from bill - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 11:23 AM EDT
- Why more pages for Apple? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 11:35 AM EDT
- It's Obvious - Authored by: lnuss on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 11:55 AM EDT
- Chucking wood - Authored by: JamesK on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 12:35 PM EDT
- Chucking wood - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 12 2013 @ 05:43 AM EDT
- Chucking wood - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 12 2013 @ 08:21 AM EDT
- WHHOOOT! - U.S. To Restart Plutonium Production for Deep Space Exploration - Authored by: SilverWave on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 01:22 PM EDT
- Coming soon to an Ubuntu release near you! - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 02:52 PM EDT
- Lawyers in Hell - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 03:17 PM EDT
- Judge tosses lawsuit back to parties - Authored by: cassini2006 on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 04:38 PM EDT
- Apple Apologised - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 07:22 PM EDT
- Revisiting the Oral Argument in Bilski v. Kappos - Authored by: macliam on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 08:27 PM EDT
- North Korean Missile Test Delayed by Windows 8 - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 09:27 PM EDT
- How much wood could a Woodchuck chuck if a Woodchuck could chuck wood? - Authored by: Barrowwright on Friday, April 12 2013 @ 04:35 AM EDT
- Dirty Tricks - Exxon Hates Your Free Speech, Tries to Censor Satirical Ad - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 12 2013 @ 07:08 AM EDT
- Off topic - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 12 2013 @ 09:52 AM EDT
- Would a Woodchuck called ChuckWood chuck wood if a can chucker called ChakaKhan chucked a can? - Authored by: SirHumphrey on Friday, April 12 2013 @ 11:42 AM EDT
|
Authored by: artp on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 11:50 AM EDT |
See the "Comes v. MS" link above for more information.
---
Userfriendly on WGA server outage:
When you're chained to an oar you don't think you should go down when the galley
sinks ?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 12:46 PM EDT |
Those that said Koh knew at a Final Office Action was and that Apple was somehow
wrong or rude to explain that "Final Office Action" didn't mean
prosecution was over are clearly wrong.
There is no way for the parties to know what a reexamination will be concluded.
That is entirely up to the Office and, if necessary, the Appeal Board. Anyone
that could issue this order:
(3) On April 9, 2013, both parties shall file a statement, not to exceed four
pages per party, regarding when their US PTO reexaminations of the opposing
party’s patents will conclude and what effect the concluded reexaminations will
have on any new trial or appeal. On April 16, both parties may file a response,
not to exceed two pages per party.
clearly doesn't understand much about how the USPTO operates.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: tz on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 01:27 PM EDT |
Lawyers used to be paid by the word, so like a coder being paid in kLOCs, would
be verbose. But these days?
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: JonCB on Thursday, April 11 2013 @ 11:21 PM EDT |
The Court can ensure expedition of the
reexaminations by ordering
Apple to inform the PTO of this
litigation. MONKEYmedia, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.,
Case No. 1:10-
CV-00319 (E.D. Tex.), Dkt. 103 at 2 (granting Apple request
for
stay and requesting PTO (and ordering plaintiff) to
expedite reexaminations),
Maroulis Decl. Ex. A. If Apple
cooperates in expediting the PTO proceedings,
which the
Court should require, the proceedings will reach completion
promptly.
Using your opponents prior cases in support of your own
argument... Priceless.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|