Authored by: PJ on Monday, April 22 2013 @ 11:08 AM EDT |
Orin Kerr has an article
on the exception, if you
would like to investigate what it's about. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 22 2013 @ 05:36 PM EDT |
Here
Unless they need to use his statements at trial, they don't ever have to
Mirandize him. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: tinkerghost on Monday, April 22 2013 @ 08:20 PM EDT |
Miranda 'rights' are frequently ignored. The only down side to skipping the
Miranda reading is that any statements made by the suspect can't be used in
court against the defendant.
The 'public safety' exception that they are using is essentially the same as the
'exigent circumstances' exemption that the courts allow for needing a warrant.
The purpose is to protect public from immanent danger and according to precedent
immanent is supposed to mean minutes not hours.
---
You patented WHAT?!?!?![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|