|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 26 2013 @ 06:27 PM EDT |
I didn't say that this prevents further appeals. I said the 9th Circuit has
already endorsed Robart's decision making to: 1) state that this is a matter of
US contract law, 2) file an injunction preventing any other injunctions or legal
proceedings from proceeding before the contract matter is settled, 3) establish
RAND pricing for the patents in question, and 4) once the pricing is
established, determine if Motorola is violating that contract.
Can any number of decisions be appealed when this is all final? Certainly. Has
the 9th Circuit likewise already endorsed and shown strong support for what so
many groklaw devotees can't wrap their brain around even though this has been
firmly established time and time and time again (that the Judge has jurisdiction
to halt all other suits, to set a RAND rate, and to determine whether or not
Motorola is violating the contract)? Abso-tutely.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|