The parent, as should be obvious, was a response to a (troll-?)post that has
since vanished. I trust that I quoted enough that the response makes
sense.
It occurred to me later that some of what I wrote could be
misconstrued by a troll, who might accuse me of claiming to speak for Groklaw.
I speak about Groklaw, but I have no authority to speak on behalf
of Groklaw, PJ, Mark, or anyone besides myself. If I got anything wrong that
matters, PJ or someone is certainly capable of correcting me — it wouldn't
be the first time.
(PJ did, at one point, publicly authorize me to speak for
Groklaw in a specific, limited, unusual circumstance to a specific person for a
specific, limited purpose. That authorization has long since expired: that
speaking didn't seem to make any difference, anyway.) --- --Bill. NAL:
question the answers, especially mine. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|