|
Authored by: OpenSourceFTW on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 01:17 PM EDT |
Post 'em here with the oopsie in the title. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: OpenSourceFTW on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 01:18 PM EDT |
Please use links to the newspick you are discussing, so we can access them after
they scroll off the page.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Jeremy Drew, Awesome - Authored by: om1er on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 08:28 PM EDT
- The Man Who Turned Off Cookies In Firefox Doesn't Care If It Hurts Advertisers - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 08:59 PM EDT
- Microsoft to buy Nook Media - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 01:28 AM EDT
- yebbut - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 02:43 AM EDT
- Newspicks - Authored by: dio gratia on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 02:20 AM EDT
- A Good Reason to Use POP Mail - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 03:26 AM EDT
- New Zealand to bar software patents, again - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 06:11 AM EDT
- Government clarifys software not patentable in New Zealand - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 06:20 AM EDT
|
Authored by: OpenSourceFTW on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 01:19 PM EDT |
Keep the discussion off topic, or you will be forced to represent SCO in the
coming case.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Youngsters advice to Neelie Croes - Authored by: sciamiko on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 02:16 PM EDT
- about that copyright thingy (and licensing) - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 03:42 PM EDT
- about that copyright thingy (and licensing) - Authored by: rcsteiner on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 04:39 PM EDT
- ah, shareware - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 08:56 PM EDT
- ah, shareware - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 01:27 AM EDT
- about that copyright thingy (and licensing) - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 04:54 PM EDT
- Indeed Borland - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 05:26 PM EDT
- Indeed Borland - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 06:08 PM EDT
- To put succintly - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 06:33 PM EDT
- Indeed Borland - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 02:17 AM EDT
- Thanks - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 05:19 AM EDT
- Lending software on line - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 05:28 AM EDT
- Two ways... - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 10 2013 @ 01:37 AM EDT
- about that copyright thingy (and licensing) - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 05:53 AM EDT
- Oh dear - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 03:52 PM EDT
- Oh dear - Authored by: rcsteiner on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 04:40 PM EDT
- Oh dear - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 07:24 PM EDT
- Oh dear - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 07:19 PM EDT
- Oh dear - Authored by: PJ on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 12:23 AM EDT
- Ah but - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 01:46 AM EDT
- Oh dear - Authored by: MadTom1999 on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 02:42 AM EDT
- A new paper has been filed in regard to claim 19 in the Apple Re-exam - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 03:06 PM EDT
- Off Topic Prenda Law - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 03:21 PM EDT
- Advice on Windows for Writers - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 04:57 PM EDT
- House Judiciary Committee Sets Up First Hearing on Copyright Reform - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 08:40 PM EDT
- Facebook's Open Compute Project to give the world an "open" top-of-rack switch - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 08:52 PM EDT
- The unofficial Otis D. Wright, II Statue Fundraiser - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 09:37 PM EDT
- Google guilty of violating antitrust law, to be fined up to $410 Million - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 10:30 PM EDT
- MS offering $1b for Nook Media LLC - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 12:31 AM EDT
- Prenda Law smackdown. - Authored by: SirFozzie on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 01:51 AM EDT
- US on a dangerour path - Authored by: complex_number on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 02:48 AM EDT
- Canonical - Re-inventing the Wheel - again - Authored by: complex_number on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 02:59 AM EDT
- A Friendly Reminder: Sunday May 12th is Mother's Day & May 16th is Groklaw's 10th Anniversary - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 09:17 AM EDT
|
Authored by: OpenSourceFTW on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 01:20 PM EDT |
Keep the Comes transcriptions coming. Thanks. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: OpenSourceFTW on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 01:22 PM EDT |
I did it, my 2nd or third Quadrafecta (I think)!
*Slow clapping*[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 01:36 PM EDT |
The stay was lifted February 2012, or maybe June 14, 2012.
If I understand the Timeline correctly, SCO requested a
change from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7 bankruptcy on August 16,
2012. Did that perhaps "de-lift" the lifting of the stay, or
create another one?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 03:16 PM EDT |
I can think of no changes in law that would apply here.
Are they going to attempt to confuse a judge?
Whatever, bring it on, it will be interesting.
Just like Prenda, they don't know how to quit.
---
You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: phands on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 03:51 PM EDT |
So.....this is after they destroyed any "evidence"?????
This is just more SCO madness.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: kawabago on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 05:44 PM EDT |
Stupidity flows down hill. It must, it's pooling in Utah! [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Twits in Utah - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 05:56 PM EDT
- Twits in Utah - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 09 2013 @ 08:02 AM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 05:51 PM EDT |
I see where IBM and SCO have stipulated in bankruptcy court that the stay in
Utah could be lifted, but I don't see any evidence that the bankruptcy court
actually acted and lifted the stay.
Am I missing something?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 05:53 PM EDT |
This seems to be way better than SCO's usual motions, possibly because this time
they actually have a reasonable argument to make. They just make that argument,
without any of the usual tap-dancing. How refreshing (and how unusual).
But... *why* are they doing this? Do they really want to be in court facing
IBM's counterclaims? Are they delusional enough that they think they're going
to come out money ahead in that encounter? Do they still think the FUD has some
value, or that they're going to recover their "good name", or some
other PR-type reason? Or is it just "we have to act like we really
believe, in order to avoid sanctions and/or veil-piercing"?
Is it in order to collect more fees? There's no more juice left in that
orange.
The trustee thinks the claims have merit? Who gave him that idea? Who sold
that idea so hard that the trustee still thinks it's true? Are they still
selling it? If so, who and why? If not, in light of the completely one-sided
defeat that SCO suffered in Novell, why can't the trustee wake up and smell
reality?
What's going on here?
MSS2[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 06:00 PM EDT |
... if the Utah court replied, "Yes, we know the stay was lifted. But we
know, and you know, that you have no case and never did, and we refuse to waste
our time on this junk."
They'd say it like judges, of course...
MSS2[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: BJ on Wednesday, May 08 2013 @ 08:05 PM EDT |
Try to grasp some -- you can't, its glibness escapes your grip.
I think I drew that comparison earlier, quite a few moons ago.
bjd
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|