|
Authored by: tknarr on Monday, May 20 2013 @ 03:22 AM EDT |
It'd be a bit harder for the troll than that. The defense would be "The USPTO
shows the patent in question to be registered to X. Plaintiff is not X and has
not claimed to be acting on behalf of X, therefore plaintiff lacks standing to
sue.". At that point the burden shifts to the plaintiff. Transfers of patents
are supposed to be registered with the USPTO, so if the plaintiff's name isn't
on the USPTO's registration paperwork it's up to the plaintiff to show the
relationship that gives them standing. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Curiouser.... - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 20 2013 @ 04:39 PM EDT
- And the Next Bit... - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 20 2013 @ 04:41 PM EDT
- Curiouser.... - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 22 2013 @ 04:06 PM EDT
|
Authored by: JamesK on Monday, May 20 2013 @ 05:46 PM EDT |
They should be required to show the paper trail of legitimate transfer. Of
course, if the transfer hasn't been registered, well too bad.
---
The following program contains immature subject matter.
Viewer discretion is advised.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|