|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 28 2013 @ 03:33 PM EDT |
You are using "abstract" differently than SCOTUS. When you use
"abstract", you mean.... well you label just about everything you
can't touch as abstract. When the Supremes say abstract, they mean vague, or
general.
A method for combining values, the method comprising:
Receiving a first value;
Receiving a second value;
adding the first value to the second value.
The Supremes would agree with you that the above is abstract as it covers all
addition.
A method for determining two weeks wages, the method comprising:
Receiving a value of a wage earned in a first week;
Receiving a value of a wage earned in a second week;
adding the value of the wage earned in a first week to the value of the wage
earned in a second week, thereby determining the wages of the two weeks.
The Supremes would not say that the above claim is to an abstraction. It does
not preclude all addition. It applies addition to a particular problem. The
manipulated values represent a real world tangible etc...[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|