Authored by: Kilz on Tuesday, May 28 2013 @ 09:11 PM EDT |
Your wrong. Your point is moot
Since SCO does not have the copyrights to UNIX they have no
control over the licensees or what has been included in their
flavor. 0, ziltch, nada, none.
They lack standing to bring forth anything.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, May 28 2013 @ 09:23 PM EDT |
I don't think it's relevant, because SCO
doesn't own the UNIX copyrights. And Novell
was given the right, by the court, to
waive any contract violations, if any.
I reread SCO's filing the last time it
tried to reopen the case, and its position
was that while it has no UNIX copyrights,
it would like to use UnixWare code that
they allegedly wrote after 1995.
The problem with that is that, as IBM pointed
out, SCO never yet showed any UnixWare code
it claimed was infringed or misused. So
SCO was trying to start the case over, you
could say, with a brand new claim.
Surprised? Not I.
Whether the court will allow it, we'll have to
wait and see.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|