decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
My appologies for not trusting your source | 457 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
My appologies for not trusting your source
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 10 2013 @ 03:33 PM EDT

If you wish to convince me, please provide Supreme Court citations for review.

As is quite evidenced in the authorings of the Supremes, the definitions and applications of how one acquires a patent (as defined by the USPTO/Federal Circuit) is highly questionable.

Additionally, you do not seperate what you are quoting from the Manual vs what you are voicing as your opinion. I have no desire to read through the manual and figure out if your entire post is a quote or only a very small part is a quote and the rest is your opinion.

While I'm willing to speak to a difference of opinion between yourself and me, the only thing I'll state about the opinion of the USPTO/Federal Circuit is that:

    Their opinion is quite different from mine.
At the same time, I'll point out:
    My opinion is based on my understandings of what the Supremes are saying - as a result, it appears the Supremes opinion is quite different from the USPTO/Federal Circuit as well!
So while I have to unfortunately accept what the USPTO/Federal Circuit are doing in the meantime - that does not prevent me from forming an opinion based on what the Supremes are stating - nor does it prevent me from offering up my opinion with regards how the system could be corrected so long as that opinion is reasonable relative to the Supremes.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )