If you wish to convince me, please provide Supreme Court citations for
review.
As is quite evidenced in the authorings of the Supremes, the
definitions and applications of how one acquires a patent (as defined by the
USPTO/Federal Circuit) is highly questionable.
Additionally, you do not
seperate what you are quoting from the Manual vs what you are voicing as your
opinion. I have no desire to read through the manual and figure out if your
entire post is a quote or only a very small part is a quote and the rest is your
opinion.
While I'm willing to speak to a difference of opinion between
yourself and me, the only thing I'll state about the opinion of the
USPTO/Federal Circuit is that:
Their opinion is quite different from
mine.
At the same time, I'll point out:
My opinion is based on my
understandings of what the Supremes are saying - as a result, it appears the
Supremes opinion is quite different from the USPTO/Federal Circuit as
well!
So while I have to unfortunately accept what the USPTO/Federal
Circuit are doing in the meantime - that does not prevent me from forming an
opinion based on what the Supremes are stating - nor does it prevent me from
offering up my opinion with regards how the system could be corrected so long as
that opinion is reasonable relative to the Supremes.
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|