|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 07 2013 @ 09:27 PM EDT |
... and may be exercising in this discussion, but so be it.
I'm just a computer applications developer with over 20 years experience, so my
legal opinions are woefully unqualified.
You see a "structure" in your proposed algorithm, I see applied
mathematics; however, we've wandered far afield of the functional claiming
112(f) topic, and I seriously doubt we'll find any common ground upon which to
agree as we approach 101 territory.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 08 2013 @ 09:15 AM EDT |
No. HOW do you determine frequency domain? Without that,
the patent cannot be implemented. Patent fail.
Yes, I want it exact - as in if we allow software patents (I
wouldn't), then source code MUST be included, and what is
patented is that source code - no pseudocode, actual, working
compilable source code (note I also want models for hardware
patents). Oh, and that source code loses copyright
protection by going into the patent - you don't get two
protections for one.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|