|
Authored by: ChrisP on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 06:01 PM EDT |
Hooray! Part 3 of this saga has now been released. More late night entertainment
reading all the details coming up. <grin>
---
Gravity sucks, supernovae blow![ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Ladies and Gentlemen, SCO v. IBM Is Officially Reopened ~pj - Authored by: squib on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 06:53 PM EDT
- awww, I missed the "synchronise watches" moment, err calendar n.t. - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 09:27 PM EDT
- Ladies and Gentlemen, SCO v. IBM Is Officially Reopened ~pj - Authored by: jvillain on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 12:29 AM EDT
- Jarndyce v Jarndyce, Bleak House, Dickens - Authored by: symbolset on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 12:56 AM EDT
- Well, here we go again... - Authored by: jbeadle on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 01:28 PM EDT
- Ladies and Gentlemen, SCO v. IBM Is Officially Reopened ~pj - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 09:58 PM EDT
- Hopefully we can stretch this to next April - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 12:32 PM EDT
|
Authored by: ChrisP on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 06:02 PM EDT |
Please put the correction in the title.
korrecshun -> correction
---
Gravity sucks, supernovae blow![ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: ChrisP on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 06:05 PM EDT |
This is an SCO free zone.
---
Gravity sucks, supernovae blow![ Reply to This | # ]
|
- request for "mobile" theme - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 07:06 PM EDT
- ..and Happy_Birthday_to_You copyright litigaton started... ;o) - Authored by: arnt on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 07:59 PM EDT
- Samsung v. Apple - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 08:42 PM EDT
- Samsung v. Apple - Authored by: Gringo_ on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 09:15 PM EDT
- heh, no - Authored by: designerfx on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 12:16 AM EDT
- Backups - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 09:44 AM EDT
- Backups - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 10:43 AM EDT
- Backups - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 03:47 PM EDT
- Ultimate Terror Weapon - Authored by: kawabago on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 04:15 PM EDT
- You Got Me - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 04:27 AM EDT
- So Huawei's OK? - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 05:03 PM EDT
- Samsung v. Apple - Authored by: knarf on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 07:23 PM EDT
- Samsung v. Apple - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 06:56 PM EDT
- Here's Another Way To Look At It - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 12:23 AM EDT
- NSA admits listening to U.S. phone calls without warrants - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 10:53 PM EDT
- Beware Trading Privacy for Convenience - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 11:42 PM EDT
- Game of Thrones - updated - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 11:47 PM EDT
- Mensch - I had to look that up - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 12:40 AM EDT
- Retired Federal Judge: Your Faith In Secret Surveillance Court Is Dramatically Misplaced - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 01:46 PM EDT
- Please PJ can Groklaw cover this - MS + Nokia claim open source is anti-competitive! - Authored by: TiddlyPom on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 05:50 PM EDT
- Off topic thread - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 09:28 PM EDT
- Off topic thread - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 10:04 PM EDT
- Off topic thread - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 03:50 AM EDT
- I remember mr. Quinn - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 10:51 PM EDT
- Off topic thread - Authored by: cjk fossman on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 11:05 PM EDT
- Off topic thread - Authored by: PJ on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 12:25 AM EDT
- Novel and non-obvious??? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 01:38 AM EDT
- Gene doesn't understand anything to do with computers - Authored by: jesse on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 05:13 AM EDT
- The Thing from the Supreme Court - Authored by: Ian Al on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 05:16 AM EDT
- Off topic thread - Authored by: GaryD on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 05:30 AM EDT
- The Thing from the Supreme Court - Another point of view - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 09:10 AM EDT
- I'm also there - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 07:15 AM EDT
- Link to Microsoft's forged video testimony - Authored by: Superbowl H5N1 on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 04:51 AM EDT
- Open source game console, ouya - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 01:16 PM EDT
- This Man Is Either The World's Biggest Patent Troll Or A Champion Of Innovation - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 05:28 PM EDT
- Former Microsoft manager wants to create 'Starbucks of Pot' - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 05:53 PM EDT
- Businesses don't understand the European Data Protection law? - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 02:29 AM EDT
- Appeal court upholds ruling declaring man “vexatious litigant” - Authored by: JamesK on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 10:37 AM EDT
- Onion Pi for secure anonymous browsing - Authored by: tiger99 on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 12:55 PM EDT
- ARM Notebooks - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 01:17 PM EDT
- Really? Bum Ethernet Cable Scrubs Rocket Launch. Sigh - Authored by: JamesK on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 01:20 PM EDT
- Senate Intel Committee Blocks Former Staffer From Talking To Press About Oversight Process - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 01:27 PM EDT
- Italian Court of Cassation - Amanda Knox - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 04:54 PM EDT
- Google challenges U.S. gag order, citing First Amendment - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 07:55 PM EDT
- MySQL man pages have been relicensed - Authored by: jesse on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 08:58 PM EDT
- Bank of America whistle-blower’s bombshell: “We were told to lie” - Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 09:49 PM EDT
|
Authored by: ChrisP on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 06:07 PM EDT |
Newspicks comments. Please add a linky to the story as the news scrolls off the
front page fairly quickly.
---
Gravity sucks, supernovae blow![ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Investigate Booz Allen Hamilton - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 06:42 PM EDT
- nsa & friends - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 09:38 PM EDT
- cynical view - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 10:59 PM EDT
- Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson has Died - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 08:55 PM EDT
- What is Project Loon? - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 11:21 PM EDT
- Outspoken Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 11:51 AM EDT
- Forget PRISM, the recent NSA leaks are plain: Digital privacy doesn’t exist - Authored by: vruz on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 10:37 PM EDT
- Declassified document claims phone metadata was searched under 300 times in 2012. - Authored by: kjs on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 02:04 PM EDT
- Baby BW and filtering data - Authored by: reiisi on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 06:57 PM EDT
- Do You Have A Right to Remain Silent? Thoughts on Salinas v. Texas - Authored by: jbb on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 10:42 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 06:22 PM EDT |
I wonder if PJ, with the help of
a lawyer and donations to defray
costs, could file a brief as a
friend of the court detailing
all of SCO's slimy manipulations
and maneuvers to let the judge
know exactly what kind of scum
he is dealing with, requesting
sanctions? [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 06:29 PM EDT |
Apparently ChrisP got distracted.
---
You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: AH1 on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 09:18 PM EDT |
Should we expect another 10 years of fun and frivolity from SCO and the folks at
BSF? Or dare we hope that the Nazgul will make short work of them.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 10:51 PM EDT |
The order says;
1. On or before June 24, 2013, SCO shall file a brief statement identifying its
claims which it agrees are foreclosed by the Novell judgment and the form of a
judgment dismissing
2. On or before June 28, 2013, IBM may file any objection to the form of that
order.
I don't see that SCO needs to list "all" of the remaining claims, only
those claims which are "foreclosed". That alone seems to me to leave
lots of room for SCO's famous mischief.
That IBM apparently has only 4 days to respond to what will likely be a very
convoluted brief from SCO seems to be an open invitation for the games to begin
(again).
---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.
"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 10:57 PM EDT |
Welcome back, my friends
To the show that never ends
Tufty
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 02:42 AM EDT |
I was in he midst of reading the old articles again, and it was more out of a
sense of nostalgia.
Now we'll see the IBM meat chopper and the Boies Schiller Boys in full swing
again. I can't wait!
This will be fun and gratification.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: complex_number on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 03:15 AM EDT |
I know that many Groklaw readers in the US won't understand what sort of
theatrical show a British Pantomime is but in most of them there is a point
where one of the actors gets into a verbal duel with another one that goes along
something like
"Oh yes it is"
"Oh no it isn't"
"Oh yes it is"
"Oh no it isn't"
This can then result in custard pies or buckets of water being thrown and
general mayhem ensuing.
I found (what I hope is) the final death throws of SCO to be so close to a plot
of a panto that I couldn't refuse to make this post.
(Darl would make a fantastic Ugly Sister!)
---
Ubuntu & 'apt-get' are not the answer to Life, The Universe & Everything which
is of course, "42" or is it 1.618?
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: tiger99 on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 04:10 AM EDT |
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: SilverWave on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 04:24 AM EDT |
SCO, always prepared to throw more good money after bad.
It could be their new corporate motto ;-)
---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Steve Martin on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 06:59 AM EDT |
SCO didn't list a single UnixWare
copyright or any UnixWare
materials allegedly infringed,
but that's what claiming "new evidence" could
end up being
about.
Actually, I believe they did.
Looking at the Second Amended
Complaint, specifically the Fifth Cause of Action, we
see that one of the
copyrights which they claim was
infringed is on UnixWare 7.1.3, the copyright
on which was
registered (by them) on June 11, 2003. Given that
UnixWare 7.1.3
was released in 2003 (according to this
Wikipedia article, I'd
say it's very possible that this
version contains code put into the product
post-1995 and so
would not be subject to the Novell ruling. That
might
give them at least a toe hold to continue this
nonsense.
--- "When I
say something, I put my name next to it." -- Isaac Jaffe, "Sports Night" [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 02:50 PM EDT |
Mentally I mean .
What happened to the bankruptcy proceedings . I thought that was a lifetime job
for the attorney Kahn.
Maybe Sco will call for Super Chicken ..CLUCKK!![ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 03:13 PM EDT |
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/91145/Update_Microsoft_behind_50M_SCO_inv
estment
Cheapest way ever to put a cloud over competitors for over a decade.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: royjones on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 04:31 PM EDT |
I started talking about going to law school ten years ago because of this case
and Groklaw. Now I'm just about to start my 3LE year and here we are again. I
wonder if even this part will be resolved when I graduate in two years.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: The Simulator on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 09:27 PM EDT |
If there's one thing this case proves: the US legal system
(or, at least, the Utah legal system) is completely broken.
It's a wonder IBM isn't bankrupt after 10 years of paying
lawyers and staff to fight this ridiculous lawsuit. Trials
of this length favor neither the plaintiff nor the
defendant, but the lawyers seem to do OK out of it. It's not
as if the courts even seem to understand the issues after
all this deliberation either.
Remember the court in Michigan that threw out SCO's claims
against Chrysler in a matter of weeks? If only the same
court could hear all of SCO's cases.
:-(
---
---
Simulation engineers do it with models virtually every day![ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: nola on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 11:45 AM EDT |
What about the SuSE arbitration issue.
Does the lifting of the bankruptcy stay allow that to be reopened?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Lazarus on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 02:28 PM EDT |
"Here's what *could* happen"
And I immediately thought of the movie Clue.
But I'm not sure that SCO can correctly compute "1 + 2 + 1 + 1".
---
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh SCO L'ndon wgah'nagl fhtagn.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: vb on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 03:44 PM EDT |
It will follow this definition of fantastic: "Imaginative or fanciful;
remote from reality."
I'm guessing that when we read SCO's briefing we will be entering a new world, a
world not bound by such trivial things as "case history". Like PJ,
SCO probably can't recall of the details of this case. If past SCO work is any
indication, they won't need to recall past details since they will be creating
new details anyway.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: jplatt39 on Monday, June 17 2013 @ 07:24 PM EDT |
I suppose it's a stupid question but when does SCO's statement detailing which
claims are foreclosed have to be in? Can we expect it before July 14th (with
IBM's due the next day) or can they delay beyond that?[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: eggplant37 on Tuesday, June 18 2013 @ 05:02 PM EDT |
Has anyone cued the dead horse yet? I'm sure it's in for a
sound flogging. Holy mackeral! Ten years old, dead four
years, and it's back!
"I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit --
It's the only way to be sure." -- Lieutenant Ellen Ripley,
Aliens, 1986[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Sunny Penguin on Tuesday, June 25 2013 @ 02:28 AM EDT |
we have any confirmation the The SCO Group actually filed on time?
---
/FL[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Well? - Authored by: moz1959 on Tuesday, June 25 2013 @ 10:43 AM EDT
|
Authored by: m_si_M on Wednesday, June 26 2013 @ 01:44 AM EDT |
A question for those versed in bancruptcy law:
- The TSG Group
(TTSGG) has no money left, yet Judge Kahn, Mr. Ken Nielsen and a few others are
still being employed. Who pays their salaries? The American taxpayer via the
bankruptcy court?
- While BSF are working on the basis of a capped fee
agreement, any kind of court proceeding will result in additional costs not
covered by the agreement. Again, will taxpayers have to pick up the costs for
this farce?
- Is it possible to hold former executives financially liable
for incurred expenses?
Replies from Legal Eagles would be
welcome.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|