Authored by: red floyd on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 07:26 PM EDT |
Paragraph numbered "3" below Summary Judgements section.
---
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a *CITIZEN* of the United
States of America.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: ankylosaurus on Saturday, June 15 2013 @ 07:58 PM EDT |
4. After that motion is decided, there will be a process and schedule set up for
the parties to respond to the court's request that they identify summary judgmet
motions filed before the current judge was assigned that they still want to be
decided, which this judge will then do.
---
The Dinosaur with a Club at the End of its Tail[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: achurch on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 05:52 AM EDT |
If I click "1115" in the quoted docket entry (linked to
http://groklawstatic.ibiblio.org/pdf4/IBM-1115.pdf), I get a 404 error. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 07:27 AM EDT |
2 paras after the third inset, "You know what? I lived this history in
excrutiating detail"
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: hardmath on Sunday, June 16 2013 @ 11:13 AM EDT |
Under item 4. of what undecided motions SCO would likely want
to renew.
---
Rosser's trick: "For every proof of me, there is a shorter proof of my
negation".[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|