|
Authored by: jesse on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 02:47 PM EDT |
Thank you [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: jesse on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 02:48 PM EDT |
Thank you. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Microsoft car gestures - Authored by: kawabago on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 04:37 PM EDT
- Microsoft car gestures - Authored by: cpeterson on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 05:23 PM EDT
- It would give the 'blue screen of death' a whole new meaning. n/t - Authored by: squib on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 05:25 PM EDT
- Patenting Language - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 05:37 PM EDT
- Microsoft car gestures - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 06:15 PM EDT
- Microsoft car gestures - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 07:29 PM EDT
- Microsoft missing a gesture - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 11:00 PM EDT
- Might be illegal here - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 04:35 AM EDT
- OBVIOUS - can not combine known tech to equal "new invention" - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 09:52 AM EDT
- Microsoft car gestures - Authored by: JamesK on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 04:38 PM EDT
- Microsoft car gestures - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 10:16 PM EDT
- Security breach stopped - Authored by: luvr on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 05:21 PM EDT
- Reclaim Your Name - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 12:15 PM EDT
- patent trolling enters OK corral - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 12:24 PM EDT
- The Shoot-out? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 05:46 PM EDT
- Center for Internet and Society Launches “Cookie Clearinghouse” - Authored by: squib on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 02:52 PM EDT
- Ghostery - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 03:19 PM EDT
- Patent Lawsuits Target Eight Banks - Authored by: JamesK on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 04:36 PM EDT
|
Authored by: jesse on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 02:49 PM EDT |
Thank you. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: jesse on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 02:50 PM EDT |
thank you. [ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Prosecutorial Discretion? What Prosecutorial Discretion? - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 03:32 PM EDT
- alternate damages theory - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 03:40 PM EDT
- Reading Comprehension Higher in HK than US - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 05:24 PM EDT
- Apple and Samsung should be 'scared' of Huawei - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 09:43 PM EDT
- Evi Nemeth Lost At Sea - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 09:52 PM EDT
- Journalism is... - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 11:27 PM EDT
- Journalism is... - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 12:43 AM EDT
- Richard Stallman, windoz and wide open back doors. - Authored by: squib on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 08:45 AM EDT
- Jeremy Hammond - any thoughts ? - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 09:44 AM EDT
- Bruce Schneier Joins EFF Board of Directors - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 10:50 AM EDT
- Happy TAU Day - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 10:54 AM EDT
- Happy TAU Day - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 06:43 PM EDT
- Reddit approved - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 08:54 PM EDT
- 'Patent Trolls' Face Rising Tide of Federal Scrutiny - Authored by: JamesK on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 12:37 PM EDT
- Restricted web access to The Guardian is Armywide - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 07:47 PM EDT
|
Authored by: jesse on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 02:53 PM EDT |
As long as Apple is willing to continue throwing money at the case it won't
matter who is right, somebody will be out of business.
And quite possibly that will be Apple.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: tknarr on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 02:59 PM EDT |
I think Judge Koh's reasoning about excluding products and
limiting/streamlining the case is "The fewer different products, the easier and
clearer the arguments will be. If Apple loses, hopefully they'll take the hint
and admit they don't have a case anywhere. If they win, their being able to
refer to this case in any future cases against other products hopefully will
nudge Samsung into settling without needing to be sued. And if they do decide to
duke it out in court anyway, it'll be fresh cases and won't be on my
docket...". [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 09:00 PM EDT |
it's not pretty, but fraught, Ah say, fraught, with meaning! [ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: red floyd on Thursday, June 27 2013 @ 10:26 PM EDT |
Apple responds that because Samsung possesses information
about its
own product and that because its infringement theories for the Galaxy
S4
essentially parallel its theories for the accused products already in
the
case
In other words, "Samsung knows what it did, and we
shouldn't have to tell
them!"
--- I am not merely a "consumer" or a
"taxpayer". I am a *CITIZEN* of the United States of America.
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: SilverWave on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 02:37 AM EDT |
I think she will be taken to task on her faulty logic and
hamstringing of Samsung.
---
RMS: The 4 Freedoms
0 run the program for any purpose
1 study the source code and change it
2 make copies and distribute them
3 publish modified versions
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
- Don't be too ruff on her (n/t) - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 03:20 AM EDT
- Does that mean Judge Koh has ultrasonic hearings? [N/T] - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 08:42 AM EDT
- Did you mean to collar rulings "dodgy", perhaps? [N/T] - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 08:45 AM EDT
- Perhaps a rebuke from a higher court will give her paws in continuing to rule for Apple. [N/T] - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 08:50 AM EDT
- After the appeal, I wonder if she will have to hold another Barkman hearing. - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 08:56 AM EDT
- Actually looking forward to the appeal of Judge Koh doggy rulings - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 09:08 AM EDT
- I'm sure SilverWave meant 'dodgy'.... - Authored by: albert on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 09:42 AM EDT
- Groklawarians, Masters of the Puniverse! - Authored by: joef on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 10:06 AM EDT
- OK class, settle down for nap time.... - Authored by: albert on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 02:28 PM EDT
- Wow you guys had some fun with that! LOL - Authored by: SilverWave on Saturday, June 29 2013 @ 01:59 AM EDT
|
Authored by: bugstomper on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 08:57 PM EDT |
After reading this article and the linked filing I wanted to refer back to some
earlier ones I recalled seeing. I see the timeline page for ApplevSamsung. I
thought that the sidebar link for "ApplevSamsung p.2" was part 2, but
it is just page 2 of ApplevSamsung. If I use Groklaw's search for Apple v
Samsung II it lists a number of articles, but I'm not sure that is everything.
For example, the only place that showed me a reference to Judge Koh streamlining
the case was by the reporter who attended the Markman hearing in which Judge Koh
said that she was going to limit the case to 25 claims on some certain number of
products. I didn't see an order saying that or saying when the deadline is for
Apple and Samsung to present the revised list, or if any response has been filed
yet, or if Judge Koh has yet issued any orders detailing the next stages in
streamlining.
Have there been any such orders? Is there a page on Groklaw that does list all
the filings so far?
[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 28 2013 @ 10:21 PM EDT |
i just got one they are real nice....
see aplle your lawsuit ways cost you money.[ Reply to This | # ]
|
|
|
|
|