|
Authored by: lnuss on Saturday, June 29 2013 @ 12:09 PM EDT |
"Asking for scanctions on SCO's officers and Legal Representatives really
shows that they are playing hardball and going for the jugular."
Somehow I missed seeing this, unless you are referring to PJ's
"dream." I'd like to know where this was referenced.
Thanks,
---
Larry N.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: UncleJosh on Saturday, June 29 2013 @ 05:03 PM EDT |
There may be two ways to read "IBM is at least entitled to seek fees and
costs". I read it to say that IBM is at least entitled to ask for
"SCO" to have to pay (or owe, they have no money or will soon have no
money) IBM's costs for the case. I don't read it as "IBM is entitled to
seek fees and costs at least", i.e. that IBM might also be entitled to seek
sanctions. "SCO" has already been sanctioned in this case for failing
to clearly state exactly which stuff was "copied", but I don't think
that's what is being said in IBMs document.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- You are dreaming - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 29 2013 @ 06:34 PM EDT
- "at least" - Authored by: PJ on Saturday, June 29 2013 @ 06:36 PM EDT
- Snapback - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 29 2013 @ 10:38 PM EDT
- The fun with Prenda Law - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 30 2013 @ 01:42 PM EDT
|
|
|
|