|
Authored by: jbb on Saturday, June 29 2013 @ 09:50 PM EDT |
The contract clearly states that it was not a joint venture yet SCO told the
court it was. IBM risks nothing by correcting SCO's lie while SCO risked a
lot by telling yet another fib. What advantage was SCO trying to get?
As
rsteinmetz70112 correctly predicted, giving IBM only 4 days to respond was an
open invitation to SCO to start playing their games again. I'd like to see
BS&F fined many millions of dollars for all of this nonsense. If other law
firms follow their lead then it will be impossible to get anything done in a
court of law because we will have to wrangle over every word.
--- Our
job is to remind ourselves that there are more contexts
than the one we’re in now — the one that we think is reality.
-- Alan Kay [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 01 2013 @ 01:39 PM EDT |
SCO has a major hurdle in that they were not even party to Project Monterey.
They are throwing out words to make it look like there's a connection, but IBM
is pointing out there is no there there...[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|