decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
ok - so Braille paper is still the best option - for now | 310 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
ok - so Braille paper is still the best option - for now
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, July 01 2013 @ 02:25 PM EDT

No surprise given how little actual R&D has gone into communication software.

That still doesn't change one of the primary points of significant cost - historically of course:

    converting a storage copy into a new print
Consider the old printers where the typeset had to be configured by hand. Now think of all the time it took to take that book and set the new print before they could start running off copies.

Now consider a digital plain text version being filtered through a braille printer converting the text into the little dots.

I never said storing the vault copy as a plain text digital version would solve all costs. I've only spoken to the initial conversion to get it to plain text and then software can take it from there and put it in any version you want.

Of course - if someone out there has patents on that kind of thing.... that's a whole different problem.

How's this for an idea, borrowed from a movie:

    How about a small portable technological device designed with a small pad where braille dots scroll across it. It takes works in plain text format and converts them into the equivalent braille dots.
Obviously there's lots more details about the device to work out such as putting in controls so one can move forward or backward in the text, adjusting speed and so on.

The idea is basically outlined. Now tell me a book publisher willing to make things more readily available to the visually impaired couldn't afford to produce the device and sell it at a profit. Tell me the device wouldn't be as good as braille paper in helping the visually impaired understand the text in front of them.

In short: tell me that my original point was wrong. My point being:

    The book publishers could have avoided a Law designed to allow third-parties from converting their works into formats that the visually impaired could use. All they had to do was consider serving the visually impaired market better.
Tell me I'm wrong on that. Tell me that the third-parties picking up that torch will fail because what they're trying to do is impossible.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )